Here I give my personal thoughts and recommendations on
test equipment and other electronic tools I use either at
work or at home.
In test equipment circles there are many terms which are either misunderstood or
used incorrectly. Consequently there are many webpages explaining, in varying
degrees of detail, what these terms mean, so I am not going to do that here other
than to provide a brief summary for completeness. For example, Wikipedia has an entry
the two words (note: accuracy and precision can also be applied
to the written word).
- How close to reality a reading is.
- How repeatable the reading is.
- A measure of the smallest change in input that can be detected.
Avometer 2001 Multimeter
AVO.... now there's a name. This rare little beauty was the first DMM I used in a
my professional career as a design engineer at
Thorn EMI Electronics. And I only
just recently found out that this was in fact made by Thorn EMI Instruments Ltd
Thorn EMI owned the company.
|Function ||Range ||Accuracy|
|AC Volts ||200mV - 1000V ||±1%|
|AC Current||200μA - 10A ||±1.5%|
|DC Volts ||200mV - 1000V ||±0.25%|
|DC Current||200μA - 10A ||±0.75%|
|Resistance||200Ω - 20MΩ|| |
|Digits ||3½ ("1.999")|| ||
As you can see its a bit of an odd design: a large case with a small LCD
at the bottom and the three 4mm sockets at the top. There are two slide switches: one for
mode (off, ac, dc/diode, resistance/continuity), and one for range. I can attest that it is a solidly built unit,
and being through-hole construction it is a very nice instrument to service. And in practice
the LCD is very clear and responsive, far better than those cheap DMMs you can get for peanuts these days.
Fluke 8060A Multimeter
As well as a basic multimeter it is good to have a second meter to both give
you a second display and to provide more advanced features that you do not
always need for general bench and field work. The 8060A is a classic DMM,
with excellent true RMS AC reading to well above the audio range. And you
can usually pick them up for very little on eBay these days.
|AC Volts ||200mV - 750V|
|AC Current||200μA - 2A|
|DC Volts ||200mV - 1000V|
|DC Current||200μA - 2A|
|Resistance||200Ω - 3GΩ|
|Frequency ||20Hz - 200kHz (auto-ranging)|
|Digits ||4½ ("1.9999")|
Discontinued. Replaced by model 289.
Original list price: $499.
This meter is great for audio work. The dB ranges are normalised to
600Ω so can
read dBu directly.
And in Relative mode you can
measure dB directly, both in DC and AC modes. The frequency counter
is useful for spot checks (although I'd recommend a proper frequency
counter for anything more involved).
Hewlett Packard HP 3478A Bench Multimeter
Hand-held DMMs are great for general measurements both at the bench and when out
and about, or even just head-down inside a mixer. However, for taking important
measurements or perhaps a long-term experiment needs monitoring then a bench
DMM is the better solution.
There are many good examples of bench DMMs on the used market these days.
The obvious contenders are there: HP/Agilent and Fluke, with some credible
offering from Keithley and Schlumberger.
From the HP stable comes the venerable 3478A 5½ digit DMM.
While it only does AC/DC volts, AC/DC current, and 2- and 4-wire
resistance (it doesn't do continuity, diode test, frequency, temperature, capacitance, transistor hfe, and so on),
it makes measurements to a high precision and, when calibrated, to a very high
The worst-case DC volts accuracy is ±(0.044% + 41) on the 30mV range
after 1 year and within ±5°C of calibration temperature.
More typically, if it says "1.00000V" on the 3V range then the worst-case inaccuracy
is ±(0.019% + 2), or ±210μV.
Another nice feature of high-end DMMs is the input resistance. The HP3478A (and
its later incarnations) have very high (>10GΩ) input resistances on the
low voltage ranges. Useful for work on high-impedance or otherwise sensitive
And of course it has a GPIB connector on the back for hooking up to a computer.
If you have one and are looking to get it calibrated I can personally
recommend Absolute Calibration.
They calibrated my 3478A for a very reasonable fee, and that included their
own van collecting and returning it to me.
Here's a video of Dave doing a teardown on a 3478A:
Hewlett Packard HP 3456A Bench Multimeter
The 3478A is a great general purpose DMM for general bench duties. For greater
precision and accuracy you need something with at least one more digit. While modern
offerings from HP/Agilent/Keysight are the 34401A the venerable 3456A (and its cousin
the 3457A) are still worthy machines to have:
AVO B183 LCR Meter
A dedicated LCR meter is a useful addition to the electronics workshop.
While the DMMs described above are able to measure resistance, they do not
measure inductance or capacitance. And while there are plenty of oriental
DMMs that will also measure L and C for you, I prefer instruments to do a few
things well rather than many things not so well.
The B183 comes from the same stable as the quirky 2001 DMM shown above.
It shares the same industrial design (case, LCD, switches, 4mm sockets) and
dates from the same period when AVO was part of Thorn.
With it's 3½ digit display and range switching it can measure up to
200µF, 20MΩ and 200H. It uses either a 100Hz or 1kHz internally-generated
sine wave, and applies very little stress on the component under test (typically 150mV or 100-150µA).
That should help keep self-heating effects to a minimum.
Overall a nice little meter in a quirky/funky case!
Tektronix TDS340A Oscilloscope
The old saying goes: "There are only three names to look for in oscilloscopes:
Tektronix, Tektronix, Tektronix". Personally I'd modify that to "Tektronix, Tektronix, LeCroy" but
only because I spent the first few years of my professional life with a LeCroy 9420.
(I've never really got on with HP/Agilent scopes -- I guess its a LoveIt-HateIt thing)
For home use these days I've upgraded from an old Tek 468 to a newer digital TDS340A.
Same 100MHz bandwidth, but it has some clever triggering modes, can do FFTs for a bit of rough spectral
analysis (it is not a spectrum analyser!), and I can dump plots to a printer
or save them to disk for later documentation or analysis.
Documentation is easy to find on the net. Here are some files I've found and saved here for posterity:
A Word on Probes
The probe and the scope form a complete tip-to-trace test system.
There is no point spending good money on a
decent scope only to spend pennies on rubbish probes. So after hunting around the net for a
make and model of scope probe that would befit this fine scope (other than Tektronix probes) I've bought a couple of brand new
Probemaster 4905-2RA 250MHz probes.
While they may not meet the highest specs of Tektronix probes they are
perfectly good enough for my home use.
Why 250MHz probes? Why not 100MHz to match the scope? To understand why
you need to understand what it means to say a scope is "100MHz". In simple
terms, a scope's bandwidth is the -3dB point of its vertical channels. So a
100MHz scope measuring a 100MHz sinewave will display it with an amplitude
of 0.707 times the actual amplitude.
Now, that does not include the probe. The probe also has a -3dB point,
so the complete system of scope plus probe will have a -3dB point lower than
the individual components. For example, a 100MHz scope with a 100MHz probe
will have a -3dB point of around 70MHz. So it is worth splashing out that little
bit extra on
higher bandwidth probes so you don't limit the bandwidth of the
tip-to-trace system so much.
One nice thing about the TDS340A is that it has a Centronics printer port
and it talks DeskJet, LaserJet and Epson protocols. I recently picked up an
old DeskJet 500 printer for next to nothing (thanks Ben!),
and with a fresh ink cartridge
I can hit the HARDCOPY button and get a printout while I'm
working at the bench. Certainly easier than scribbling down some
measurements on a scrap of paper.
I scanned in a couple of scope plots during the
development of my dualfo.
And having a hard paper copy is great for making annotations or adding other notes.
Tektronix TDS540C Oscilloscope
As circuits increase in complexity and speed you need a bigger and faster scope to see
what those circuits are doing. For example, on a recent design I had three inputs and an
output (audio input, control voltage, carrier signal, output) to work with,
and being able to monitor all of them
on the same screen would have been very illuminating.
On the used test equipment market the venerable TDS series
digital scopes from Tektronix are excellent buys. The TDS540C is one such beast,
with four 500MHz input channels, up to 2GS/s sampling (up to 100GS/s with ET sampling),
and various options including the highly-useful Centronics printer port (see the above
comment about printers).
While modern DSOs (like the TDS340A) have lots of super-whizzo features,
there is still a need for a good analogue scope in the lab. They are much
faster to use (no faffing around in menus); they usually don't have fans
(quieter operation); they don't lie to you -- what you see on screen is a
direct view of the voltage at the input terminals (no need to think about
Nyquist when setting the timebase); and a quicker turn-on time.
I own, or have owned, a variety of analogue scopes, including:
If you're on the lookout for a good scope to learn on then I would strongly
recommend the Hameg.
- Tektronix 2215A - fanless 60MHz dual channel
- Tektronix 465M - fanless 100MHz dual channel
- Tektronix 468 - 100MHz dual channel with early sampling system and very noisy fan
- Hameg HM203-6 (really nice beginner scope)
Hewlett Packard HP 5334A Universal Counter
While a scope can be used to make frequency or period measurements of a cycle or two,
a proper standalone counter makes the job much easier and provides more precise
results and more ways to measure the signals.
It also frees up the scope for probing around the circuit looking
at waveforms while the counter keeps an eye on frequency.
HP (now Agilent) produce some really good counters. This one I picked up
on eBay a while ago:
One important feature of this counter over cheaper/simpler models is that
it uses the reciprocal technique. Simple counters measure frequency by
counting the number of cycles of the input signal in a given window of time.
With simple decimal scaling you get the result in Hz, kHz, MHz, etc (my old
Racal Dana 9902A did this). Unfortunately this means that measuring low
frequencies with any degree of precision can take some time: to measure a
1Hz signal to three significant digits requires a gate time of at least 1000
seconds. Yes, I know, I could measure the period and then calculate the
frequency from that with a pocket calculator. But dammit that's what
test equipment is for!!!
The reciprocal technique takes the opposite approach: the input signal
determines how long the gate is open to count pulses from a stable reference
oscillator (*). A CPU then does the maths to work out frequency. All it needs
is one complete cycle of the input to measure the frequency to a very high
degree of precision. In the case of the 5334A, to nine significant digits.
Taking the earlier example, with the reciprocal technique it will take a little over
one second to measure a 1Hz waveform. Very useful when developing
oscillators for example.
(* - for greater accuracy use an ovened oscillator, or a rubidium oscillator, or
a GPS-locked oscillator, depending on how much you're prepared to pay).
Hewlett Packard HP 5315A Universal Counter
While the larger 5334A is suitable for detailed measurements the smaller 53135A
is an ideal frequency counter when you want a quick measurement of a
single signal. And being a reciprocal counter it is quick to use for measuring
low-frequency audio signals.
Also, if you can, get one with the TCXO option (001) installed as that
provides a more stable reference oscillator. Only after opening the case did
I discover that mine has that option.
As the saying goes: "Power corrupts. Absolute power... is kinda neat."
Bench power supplies are so important in the electronics lab, and yet so often they
are hidden away, never discussed; the family cousins that everyone acknowledges
exist but doesn't mention in polite company.
I've designed, built, and used many power supplies over the years.
Expensive ones. Cheap ones.
High voltage ones and high current ones (sometimes both at the same time).
Small ones and heavy ones. Simple ones and complex ones. Most of the time though
you can get by with a basic dual bench power supply. Which I guess is why
they're so popular.
Hewlett Packard HP 6236B
Probably one of the nicest little bench PSUs for op-amp development. Two
outputs provide tracking bipolar rails up to ±20V limited to 500mA.
Plenty for op-amp circuits.
The third output provides a higher current 0-6V up to 2A, which can be used for
a digital rail or perhaps a control voltage.
Two meters provide voltage and current monitoring, switchable between the
All in all it is a nicely packaged little bench PSU:
These single (and their dual cousins) bench supplies are a common sight
in UK R&D labs. They're everywhere! In schools, universities, and labs,
they have provided stable supplies for many years.
The basic single output model (pictured below) can supply up to 30V at 2A,
and can operate
in constant-voltage with current limit, or constant-current modes. Very useful
for bringing up new circuits with the current limit turned right down!
Hewlett Packard 6624A
Automated testing often requires several supplies at different voltages.
Or, in the case of designing analogue synthesizers, you also want several
CVs for controlling VCOs, VCAs, VCFs, etc. Together with an
you can quickly put together an automated system to power and/or drive
The 6624A is a 4-channel power supply unit which is ideal for this.
It can supply more than enough power for smaller op-amp circuits, and
it also features programmable over-voltage and over-current protection
just in case your test program sends the wrong voltage setting.
Hewlett Packard 6612C
Sitting roughly half-way between the 6236 (small, versatile) and the 6624 (GPIB, flexible protection)
is this versatile little chap.
Up to 20V and up to 2A makes it perfect for powering smaller embedded systems designed
to be powered from wall-warts. And having RS232 (as well as the ubiquitous GPIB) makes it
a doddle to hook up to a PC for some quick automated testing.
Oscilloscopes are great for showing you what is happening to a signal in the
time domain. But often times you want to know what is happening in the
frequency domain. This is what spectrum analysers provide. They can
measure cutoff frequencies, resonant frequencies, and filter responses amongst
Spectrum analysers fall into two general types: swept filter and FFT. The
former is the classic analogue spectrum analyser, sweeping a filter over the
required range, then measuring the signal level coming out of the filter. Great
for radio frequencies, but due to filter response times not so good for audio
(Note: the exeception that proves this rule is the HP 3580A, which
covers the range 5Hz to 50kHz).
With the advent of cheap computing power came the FFT-based spectrum
analysers (or dynamic signal analysers (DSA) as they tend to be called).
sample the signal as-is, without any filtering, then apply the power of FFT maths
to extract and display the spectral content. This provides data much faster as
you only need to wait as long as one cycle of the smallest frequency you are
interested in. For example to resolve to 1Hz requires a 1 second measurement
period. More typically, to cover the audio range with a 25kHz span would take
about 15ms per acquisition, or 64 updates per second, i.e., realtime.
Note: this is theory. Actual machines may add processing time, or require
the sample record to be full before processing, etc.
Hewlett Packard HP 35660A Dynamic Signal Analyzer
The first spectrum analyser I owned was an old HP 141T, with
a range of plugins, including one that covered the audio range. That was a beast
indeed! One problem with swept filter spectrum analysers is that as you
reduce the video width to get more detail in the spectrum, because of the
delays introduced by the high-Q filters, sweep times could be measured in tens
of seconds. Tedious, especially for audio work where you might want a
video bandwidth of a few Hertz.
I used an HP 3561A in my first job building high power passive audio filters,
hand-winding coils and building fan-cooled capacitor banks, tuning them with
the aide of the 3561A and its internal noise source to get the right cut-off
frequency and slope.
Nowadays I use an HP 35660A DSA at home for audio development. It has
the advantage of two input channels, so together with its built-in signal source
it can also be used as a network
analyser to show both amplitude and phase response of audio filter networks.
Here's a video of Dave fixing up a 35660A: EEVBlog
Hewlett Packard HP 8594E Spectrum Analyzer
Analogue electronics can be a tricky thing at times. As the old saying goes:
"amplifiers oscillate, oscillators don't". It is remarkably easy to make
a seemingly simple analogue circuit oscillate at a high frequency, maybe 100s of kHz or even up in the MHz range. All it takes is a bit of capacitive coupling in the wrong place, a
lead too long (higher inductance), or some nefarious feedback path you hadn't
thought of, and suddenly you're an AM transmitter! So having some equipment
that can detect signals up to very high frequencies is very useful even when
designing audio-band circuits. Especially useful for on-the-bench sniffing around a circuit or module to check for any unwanted emissions as part of
EMC pre-compliance checking (radiated emissions for synthesizer modules
is likely to extend up to 1GHz, unless you have an internal clock over 108MHz in which case you could be looking at up to 6GHz).
HP/Agilent have a range of portable spectrum analysers in the 8500-series.
I picked up this 8594E from the usual
place for a great price, and while it may not have the resolution bandwidth
of a larger non-portable lab-grade machine (it only goes down to 1kHz, bigger machines can go down to 3Hz) it is certainly good enough for probing
around a circuit to see what it might be doing, good or bad.
Developing and testing audio electronics (for example,
often requires the measurement of signal noise and distortion to a degree that cannot
be easily achieved with spectrum analysers, oscilloscopes or multimeters.
Measuring these characteristics is best done with dedicated test equipment,
such as the industry-standard
Audio Precision series.
However they are rather expensive, so the hobbyist has three options:
- older-generation audio analyzers,
- home-brew apparatus
- PC soundcard and software
The PC soundcard option can be the cheapest option. I say "can be" since to
get worthwhile results you need a very good soundcard, ideally external to the PC rather
than built-in to minimise the noise floor, and software that can analyse the
data (e.g., TrueRTA).
To measure distortion products it is also a good idea to
build or buy
an analogue notch filter so that you can remove the fundamental test tone and get the most
from the soundcard's dynamic range. You also need a low-distortion signal
generator to minimise any masking effects that a noisy generator would introduce
(a PC soundcard might be good enough).
And then you need to set it up in a way that minimises noise-pickup from the surrounding environment.
Building your own THD Analyser
can be very rewarding if you enjoy the challenge and have the abilities to build it
to the required high standard. It most certainly is not the cheapest option, especially
if you include your time. But, when finished, you end up with equipment that
you can tailor to your specific needs.
Finally, by far the quickest overall option is to buy a used audio analyser from a
elsewhere. Names to look out for include
Audio Precision, HP, Boonton, and Tektronix.
Hewlett Packard HP 8903B Audio Analyzer
The 8903B is the first audio analyser I acquired, incorporating a low-distortion sinewave
oscillator, a tunable notch filter, a frequency counter, and a sensitive RMS AC voltmeter. Each
of them on their own are very useful, but having them together in one instrument
with GPIB control makes for a versatile test setup. The photo below shows my
8903B driving itself at about 1kHz. The displayed distortion+noise is -87.43dB,
or about 0.0043%, with a 30kHz low-pass filter.
Where I think the HP 8903B excels at benchwork, with its front panel and
built-in computer, the standard reference audio analyser is, of course, the
Audio Precision analyser.
The first machine they produced after spinning out of Tektronix was the
System One. While no longer supported and ancient by modern standards, it
still achieves a respectable level of performance, easily 10dB better than
In the "22" configuration it has two analogue channels (two generator
output channels and two analyser input channels) but lacks the DSP
option of the "222" or "322".
Note that the one I have came with the optional wow-and-flutter board and two optional
filters for CCIR and A-weighted noise analysis. Nice.
The downside of the AP systems is that they require an external PC to
operate them. The original software requires either DOS (to run S1.EXE) or
early Windows (an application called ApWin), so keeping an old PC going is something to think about.
But I think that is a small price to pay for owning these machines.
The connection to the PC was originally through a custom interface card, which
in the first versions was a something (but not exactly) like an ECP/EPP printer
port on a non-standard I/O address long
before the days of ECP/EPP ports. Today there are at least
three four options:
Note that the newer AP-designed USB-APIB adaptors do not support the System One.
- Design and build your own
- Acquire an original APIB card - around £150 to £250 on eBay
- APIB-LPT software and cable - about $150
- diyaudio USB-APIB adaptor - about $150
After a bit of ferreting around and asking for some help from the obvious
place I have pieced together the latest/last S1 and the two companion post-processor
tools POST and PLOT.
Download them (zip folder, 280kB)
Marconi 893B Audio Power Meter
When developing power amplifiers, for driving headphones and speakers,
it is good to both have a representative load that can be set to a range of
different impedances, together with a power meter. The Marconi 893B conveniently
satisfies both requirements.
I find it particularly useful in developing headphone amps, as I can set
it to a range of impedances to see how the amplifier will behave when driving
different headphones (I typically test at 8Ω, 32Ω and 600Ω)
where I'm typically only outputting a watt or so.
Hewlett Packard HP 3311A Function Generator
The 3311A is a strange little curiosity. I believe it was an attempt by HP to produce
a low-cost signal generator to compete at the lower end of the price spectrum,
probably aimed at schools and colleges and basic function generator duties at the bench. Which is a fine idea, but on closer
inspection you can clearly see that HP, at the time, just didn't understand
how to make something cheap: high-quality Allan Bradley pots, gold-plated
double-sided PCB, a sturdy diecast clam-shell case making servicing easy,
and high-quality panel furniture (knobs, binding posts, etc).
It sports a decent spec as well, covering the range 0.1Hz to 1MHz,
three waveforms (sine, triangle, square),
a separate TTL-compatible pulse output,
fully-adjustable amplitude and offset,
and even has connections on the back to allow modulation of the internal VCO.
Hewlett Packard HP 3325B Synthesizer/Function Generator
A decent lab needs a decent signal generator. While the 8903B has a low-distortion
sine oscillator suitable for audio measurements it is not very precise in frequency and only
covers the range 20Hz to 100kHz.
The 3311A has a wider range (0.1Hz to 1MHz), has a choice of waveforms, and output
amplitude and offset control, but it is only suitable for rough measurements as the
frequency is liable to drift with time, and the dial setting is not very precise.
So this is where a machine like the 3325B comes it. It is a synthesized function
generator, giving 11-digit frequency precision, referenced to a quartz crystal, covers the range 1μHz to 21MHz sine (less for
square, triangle and ramp, or up to 60MHz for TTL-compatible pulses), has a separate modulation oscillator for AM or PM duties,
both linear and log sweep modes, GPIB, and so on.
There are options to fit an ovened crystal for better stability (like mine
has), or use an external reference clock for greatest precision,
such as a GPS-disciplined 10MHz oscillator.
Hewlett Packard HP 8165A Programmable Signal Source
The 8165A sits between the 3325B and 3311A. It is certainly superior to the basic 3311A, although one could argue that the 3U case,
the noisy fan,
and the weight of the 8165A make it a tiresome beast compared to the lightweight
3311A. And when you need a simple source to tickle a circuit, the 3311A is right
there in moments, rather than faffing around with the 8165A's parameter punching.
At the other end of the spectrum, the 3325B is visibly superior when it comes to frequency
control, with seven more digits of precision than the 8165A, over a wider range
(down to μHz), and the option of an ovened crystal
for greater stability. The 3325B also has
superior sweeping facilities over the full frequency range, as well as a built-in modulation signal generator, and can provide a TTL clock up to 60MHz.
And yet... I find the 8165A sits in a sweet-spot all of its own. In many ways
it is inferior to the 3325B, and yet in several ways it is actually superior!!!.
Its sine, triangle and square output waveforms cover the full frequency range of 1mHz to 50MHz (the 3325B restricts the square to 11MHz and the triangle and ramps to 11kHz). With Option 002 the 8165A can also do logarithmic frequency sweeps, and while the sweep profiles are greatly restricted compared to the 3325B, what it does have is very usable for electronic music instrument
development. And where the 3325B has a built-in modulation generator (a capable signal
generator in its own right) the 8165A can generate counted bursts -- very useful for
testing the response of VU meter drivers for example.
In many ways, unless you need the higher precision or extensive frequency sweeping
capabilities of the 3325B, then the 8165A is very close to the ideal bench signal
generator for the general electronics lab. And the really crazy thing is how little
they go for on ebay!
Hewlett Packard HP 3314A Function Generator
With a similar feature to the 8165A - albeit in a package half the size - sits
the 3314A. While it only goes up to 20MHz, it adds a more flexible sweeping mode,
arbitrary waveform mode (with a scope you can "draw" the waveshape),
and a half-cycle mode.
It has a second internal oscillator for triggering sweeps and bursts, which is
actually really useful to be able to set it up for repeated bursts or sweeps
into a circuit.
For general audio and electronic music circuit development this is a
perfect bit of kit. Granted the sine wave is not pure enough for distortion
checking, but that's what the audio analyser is for.
Hewlett Packard HP 8112A Pulse Generator
Signal and function generators are all well and good for analogue development,
but when it comes to a bit of digital work you need signals that are high or low
rather than sine or triangle. While most of the signal sources can generate square or
rectangular waveforms, they don't provide the kind of control that you really need.
Enter the pulse generator. In this case the HP 8112A. All it does is generate
pulses. Single pulses. Bursts of pulses. Continuous streams of pulses.
With variable rise and fall times and slopes. And all manner of other parameters
to define the stream of pulses you need to stimulate your circuit. Very useful
in developing digital circuits.
Oscilloscopes show you how a voltage changes with time. Spectrum analysers
show you the spectral content of a signal. Logic analysers move up the semantic
ladder and show you a logic interpretation of a signal or group of signals, and
can also interpret sequences of states as higher-level events (e.g., processor
instructions, programs, etc).
I've had this little chap in my kit bag for years. It is small, portable,
USB-powered, and has more than enough channels and speed for the majority of
on-site debugging (ah, the life of the travelling apps engineer!).
While the PC software may not be the very latest and funkiest with millions
of data analyser plugins galore, what it does is good enough, and with a
bit of thought can be made to do what you want, i.e., zoom in on the glitch
or whatever and work out what is going wrong.
Probably the zenith in Logic Analyzers was the Agilent 16702B.
Running HP-UX (not Windows as later machines ran),
a large colour touch screen, or keyboard and mouse, or remote X sessions,
five slots for building a system for your specific needs,
for the home lab these are the machines of choice:
I am slowly pulling together software tools and libraries for this machine.
You can find what I've so far found here:
Logic Analyser Library.
So far I have:
The inverse assembler (IA) is useful when working on a CPU/micro or a
- 16702B Setup CD ISO (various versions)
- HP10391B Inverse Assembler
Thanks to Glen for help in sourcing the CD images.
Hewlett Packard HP 85
Ancient. Truly ancient. And yet.... so easy to use, quiet (no fan), instant turn-on (a couple of seconds
and it's ready to go), with a built-in printer and tape drive storage, decent keyboard, and a 5" mono
screen. It is, in my opinion, pretty close to the ideal instrument controller. And with the
legendary HP maths abilities it is also rather good at analysing the data for you!
On a more detailed note, for anyone contemplating hunting one out for a HPIB controller
make sure you get the HPIB interface card - unlike it's larger brother the HP 87 it does not
come with HPIB as standard.
Truly a thing of beauty: