





And now for some mathematics....

 The Walsh Transform
The heart of Walsh functions is the Walsh transform. In itself it is quite simple:
Ok, what I actually mean is that it is a summation over a window of data. To turn
it into something more readable, lets say there are N samples (where N is some power
of 2, eg. 16, 32, 64, etc), then we can calculate the Walsh coefficients from:
The above equations are for analysis, while what we want for synthesis are the
opposite functions, that generate x(t). The following equation does just that:
The only extra maths involved in this is to generate the individual Walsh functions,
which we need to do the above calculations. There are basically two main methods
to use: Hadamard matrices, and a recursive function.
 Hadamard matrix
For a brief summary have a look here.
The Hadamard matrix is useful if you have lots of memory to spare, which you could
fill with a precalculated Hadamard matrix from which you can pluck the Walsh functions
from. To work out which row of the matrix corresponds to which Walsh function, just
count up the number of sign changes  the number you arrive at is the Walsh function
number.
For example, if there are 4 sign changes in a row, then that row corresponds to WAL(4,t)
 Difference Equation
Another way of calculating Walsh functions is to use a difference equation, in
particular the one devised by Harmuth as shown below.
This method uses a recursive function to calculate a single point for a single Walsh
function at a time, which stops recursing for WAL(0,t) = 1.
However, it is conceptually easier to use, if somewhat slower. The Tcl Walsh viewer
uses a variation on the difference equation to, in effect, recursively home in on
a section of the Hadamard matrix (which, in effect, is what the difference equation
does).





Copyright © 20012018 Neil Johnson


  
